NY Times Show Bush To Still Be Idiot

According to this article in the NY Times, Bush already considers his presidency as "a big one in the sweep of history".

I'm sorry, but don't we have to be able to look at something from a historical perspective before making those kinds of statements? Is Bush's arrogance so huge that he truly sees himself as some kind of rock star president that will go down in the annals of history as an example of greatness?

Every time that man opens his mouth, stupidity flows out, but he's already speaking to the historians about how wonderful he is. I'm amazed he doesn't dislocate his shoulder patting himself on the back.